May 2018 : ECIS hosts an event on “What are the barriers to harnessing AI in Europe?” You can find a summary of the interesting presentations held here: ECIS summary of event on AI – 3 May 2018


January 25, 2018 @ 10:22 am
November 23, 2017 @ 6:58 am

The Future of AI in Europe

Should AI be regulated in Europe, beyond the legal framework that GDPR sets out? Is the current state of the art in AI, with the ever increasing use of big data and algorithms in our daily lives fit for purpose?

When?   Wednesday 29 November 2017, 15:00 to 17:30 followed by a cocktail reception

Where? Clifford Chance LLP, Avenue Louise 65, Box 2, 1050 Brussels

The European Committee of Interoperable Systems (“ECIS”) invites you to its traditional end of year debate on technology policy.

The aim is to throw more light on the key challenges with respect to AI and big data. We will hear different perspectives on the matter from academia, the EU institutions and business.

Networking cocktail Please join us afterwards for a cocktail and canapé networking reception, providing an opportunity to speak with some of our speakers about issues raised during the debate.

Please note that the event is by invitation only, and places are limited. 

Please RSVP to or telephone Elena Bek at +322 533 5964 ECIS website:

Read more on ECIS event held on 29 11 2017 – The Future of AI in Europe – Summary

ECIS Press Statement

The following is a statement by ECIS commenting on the European Commission’s Communication on Resilience, Deterrence and Defense: Building strong cyber security for the EU, published on 13 September 2017.

Brussels – 13 September 2017 – ECIS welcomes the Communication on Resilience, Deterrence and Defense: Building strong cyber security for the EU, in particular the European Commission’s renewed focus on education and training and other initiatives aimed at improving cyber-resilience, which ECIS has long argued should be one of the top priorities.  Indeed, attacks such as Dyn and WannaCry have demonstrated that one of the greatest vulnerabilities to the Internet of Things (“IoT”) ecosystem is human error – whether clicking on phishing links, failure to update or patch systems, or lack of adherence to basic practices of cyber hygiene.

Whilst it is critical that regulators across the European Union act in a co-ordinated fashion to enhance and promote a regional cyber-secure ecosystem, it is also important that they do not advance policies which could inadvertently stifle innovation and thereby undermine cyber resilience.  The vast potential of the IoT for the European Union will be realised only in an EU policy climate which focuses on managing risk and empowering innovators to be sufficiently dynamic, adaptive, and responsive to an ever changing cyber threat landscape.

ECIS is of the opinion that the proposed framework for certification and labelling scheme are inadequate solutions to the challenges cyber security poses.  It will add complexity and costs for both providers without adequately protecting end users.  In addition, ECIS fears certification could instil a false sense of security in users.

International standards alignment must remain a priority.  In addition, there is a need for cyber security risk management frameworks.  This guidance should include information as to how respective standards address security requirements laid down in EU regulation.  Where gaps in standards and certification schemes are identified these should be pursued via the normal EU standardisation system.

About ECIS

ECIS is an international non-profit association founded in 1989 that endeavours to promote a favourable environment for interoperable ICT solutions.  It has actively represented its members regarding issues related to interoperability and competition before European, international and national fora, including the EU institutions and WIPO.  ECIS’ members include large and smaller information and communications technology hardware and software providers.  The association strives to promote market conditions in the ICT sector that ensure there is vigorous competition on the merits and a diversity of consumer choice.

ECIS’ member companies have a long and established track record of providing resources and operational expertise to EU authorities so as to effectively address cyber security and related policy questions.  In particular, ECIS has always been an advocate of a co-operative regulation model for cyber security.

Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) is not a new phenomenon; it has been around for at least 50 years as possibly the grandest of all challenges for computer science. Recent developments have led to AI systems providing remarkable levels of progress and value in different areas – from robotics in manufacturing and supply chain, to social networks and e-commerce, and systems that underpin society such as health diagnostics. As with any technology there is an initial period of hype, with excessive expectations and then a period of reality and measurable results – we are at the beginning of such a period right now. Our comments below reflect our initial thinking on these issues, and concern machine learning systems that are trained with data sets and algorithms, and not the so-called Artificial General Intelligence.

As with similar technological developments in the past, it is important that the industry is left free to develop, and that technology evolves in time according to the needs of businesses and consumers. Intervening at such an early stage would have detrimental impact on the evolution of this technology, and should therefore be avoided. Nonetheless, there is a need for a strong ethical approach as to how AI should be applied, which should be properly set out at EU level (if not at global level).

For the development of AI technology, we consider essential that the algorithm used for AI purposes is transparent (in the sense of Recital 71 of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which means that where there is unintended bias, this bias can be addressed. Moreover, it is appropriate that these systems are subjected to extensive testing on the basis of appropriate data sets as such systems need to be “trained” to gain equivalence to human decision making.

With regard to liability, it is important among other aspects, to consider the complex supply chain in AI services. Software algorithms and data sets which are used to train the software are important elements but other aspects need to be considered, such as the purpose of the AI application, the sector specific norms are in place. In addition, algorithms should be inspected at a technical level, so that the reasons for malfunctions can be established.

Finally, we would also like to refer you to the following academic papers, which do not necessarily reflect our position on the relevant matters, but we considered them useful and interesting background for you to have in the context of your ongoing fact-finding study on AI:


Follow ECIS

Privacy Preference Center


Cookies that are necessary for the site to function properly.

gdpr, wordpress_{hash}, wordpress_logged_in_{hash}, wordpress_test_cookie, wfvt_{hash}, __cfduid


Cookies used to track user interaction and detect potential problems. These help us improve our services by providing analytical data on how users use this site.

_ga, _gid, _gat, collect